Showing posts with label ice-cream. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ice-cream. Show all posts

Monday, September 23, 2013

Liberty Global: Discovering New Possibilities


It's always a pleasure to tell CSR Reporting blog readers about reports that I have been involved with. Last year, I posted about Liberty Global's inaugural Corporate Responsibility Report  and now, I am delighted to bring you an update in the form of the second global report, called Discovering New Possibilities, which was published last week.
 


This report represents a step up in transparency for Liberty Global with a GRI G3.1 report at Application Level B, more extensive than the first C Level report, and covers operations in including UPC (Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Austria, Czech Republic and Hungary), Unitymedia Kabel BW (Germany), Telenet (Belgium), VTR (Chile) and Liberty Cablevision Puerto Rico.
 
A lot can change in a single year, which is reflected in this new report from Liberty Global. The company is now the largest international cable company in the world, following the acquisition of Virgin Media in June 2013, and expansion of presence in different markets, generating a whole lot of economic and social value with revenues of over $17 billion and employing over 36,000 employees. With 24 million customers and over 48 million subscribers to video, internet and voice services, Liberty Global maintains an operation which is transforming access to the digital world - a transformation which is relevant to the quality of life of millions of people in the markets in which the company operates. Liberty Global's approach to delivering this transformation is routed in a compelling vision of the role that Liberty Global can play in society. It's much more than selling modems or set-top-boxes. It's about changing the way people live their lives. It's not enough to connect. It's about knowing what to do with that connection. In the language of Liberty Global, this means Discovering New Possibilities.
 
 
Possibilities for New Digital Skills
The Digital Agenda for Europe (DAE) recognizes that access to next-generation broadband with speeds exceeding 100 Mbps (megabytes per second) by 2020 is vital for long-term economic development and competitiveness. The goals of the DAE range from fast broadband for all to increased online commerce to 60% of disadvantaged people using the internet regularly. This is because digital technologies have "enormous potential" to benefit our everyday lives and support the economic wellbeing of Europe, as well as contribute to environmental resource efficiency. Liberty Global, as a seriously large player, recognizes that continually improving technology is not going to do the job. The technology needs to go where it's needed and people need to understand how to use it for their own benefit and for that of others. For example, in Belgium, Liberty Global's company, Telenet, installed 450 multimedia monitors in patient rooms at a hospital, providing video conference capabilities for patients and secure access to patients’ medical information for use by hospital staff, helping to increase the efficiency of staff while providing patients with opportunities to engage with their families and friends. Also in Belgium, Telenet Foundation developed an award-winning program called Recup PC, which helps people to get online, understand how to use the technology and develop digital literacy.
 
Possibilities of Buttons
Another great example of helping people not only to be aware of new technology but also to increase their capabilities is Liberty Global's innovative web tool called Internet Buttons. This enables people who have some experience in using the internet to create easy-to-use customized starter page for family members and friends who are new to the internet or find it confusing. Large, brightly colored ‘buttons’ act as shortcuts to websites such as email, search engines, Skype, eHealth or other services tailored to the user. These can be saved to a personal homepage, easily accessible at the click of a button and a whole lot less confusing than a bunch of unrecognizable icons and symbols that only experienced users can navigate around. New digital skills – button-wise – is a way to bring the internet to those who otherwise would probably never be able to figure it out on their own. Like most things, it's easy when you know how. But if no-one helps you, you never know how.
 
 
 
Possibilities of Engaging Children in Innovation
In Romania, Liberty Global company UPC has developed a platform to get kids interested in technology involved by submitting ideas with the possibility of winning a trip to attend a NASA educational summer camp. Over 230,000 visits to the Tech School website and 570 ideas later, the winning ideas included a super bionic hand, a mobile-phone-charging-T-shirt and a mobile astronomy observatory, showing that, when you provide the tools, kids get engaged and discover new possibilities. The overall winner of Tech School 2012 developed a prototype of a bionic hand with enhanced control and strength, which has wide-ranging implications for surgery, telemedicine and other remote interventions. A UPC Tech School grant will help develop an advanced version of this prototype.
 
 
Possibilities of Keeping Kids Safe Online 
Another area in which this report demonstrates the impact and potential positive impact of a company as large and influential as Liberty Global is the ways in which it advances technology, awareness and education to protect kids online. As a mom who has had personal experience of my own child getting into a potentially very dangerous online situation, which I managed to catch in the nick of time, and with kids who are mesmerized by the big, medium and small screens, I am only too aware of the need to protect our children. Liberty Global's report discusses this in detail and provides examples of how the company is supporting media literacy for parents in the Netherlands, campaigning to keep passwords safe in Chile and working in partnership in Europe to create safe internet experiences. The focus of protecting children is on education and empowerment.
 
 
Corporate Responsibility Performance
The nice thing about Liberty Global's report is that stories such as these show how positive impact is created through Liberty Global's core business. This is not a report about switching off lights at the end of the day and retrofitting offices with low-flow toilets (although there is some of that too). The main content of Liberty Global's report is about the role that the Company plays in society, which includes significant discussion about public policy and the complexities of creating internationally aligned protocols for data privacy and more. Liberty Global is active in helping define and shape the future of our digital world, which makes this report quite relevant for almost everyone.
 
Liberty Global's report also covers areas of responsible performance in environmental impacts, people management, supply chain monitoring and management and other relevant issues which affect the sector such as conflict minerals and an important discussion about e-waste, one of the sector's most significant impact areas. Liberty Global achieves a 36% retrieval and recycling rate of set-top boxes and modems, which adds up to over 5,000 tons of e-waste which avoids landfill. That’s equivalent in weight to offering 10,000 people an annual supply of ice cream every year for over 25 years. Unless you are me, in which case an annual supply would last about two days.
 
Take a Look – Give Feedback – Think Future G4
The transition from first reporter to experienced reporter is not easy. Liberty Global has delivered an equally relevant and more transparent report this year, which places the Company on the right road for a G4 report next time around. With this in mind, I encourage you to take a look, and give feedback!

 
 
elaine cohen, CSR consultant, winning (CRRA'12) Sustainability Reporter, HR Professional, Ice Cream Addict. Author of Understanding G4: the Concise guide to Next Generation Sustainability Reporting  AND  Sustainability Reporting for SMEs: Competitive Advantage Through Transparency AND CSR for HR: A necessary partnership for advancing responsible business practices Contact me via www.twitter.com/elainecohen   or via my business website www.b-yond.biz   (Beyond Business Ltd, an inspired CSR consulting and Sustainability Reporting firm)
 

Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Is reporting bad news?

As mentioned in my previous post, the annual  CR Reporting Awards CRRA '13 Winners were announced during a special, one-day, by-invitation-only CR Perspectives conference hosted by CorporateRegister.com in late April. The conference shared the results of the CR Perspectives survey, which was completed by hundreds of people around the world and yielded some very interesting results. A full analysis of the results will be published and made freely available by the end of May on CorporateRegister.com.

I chaired the CR  Perspectives conference, which gave me the opportunity to hear and share CR Perspectives with a full-house of fascinating people from all over the world, including China. 

Paul Scott, MD of CorporateRegister.com, a fully-fledged Sustainability Reporting authority and celebrity, told me: “As CR reporting continues to evolve, CorporateRegister was very pleased to offer a forum where recent developments and the direction of reporting could be debated by an informed audience of practitioners. CR reporting developed organically, and as it matures we find various organisations attempting to steer it one way or the other. What our CR Perspectives survey has shown is that people involved in reporting make up their own minds, and we could be in for some surprises.”

CR Perspectives opened up with  Richard Howitt, MEP and European Parliament's spokesperson on Corporate Social Responsibility who spoke about the recent non-financial reporting directive which has been proposed by the European Commission, which, if adopted, will require companies of 500 employees and more to disclose information on "policies, risks and results as regards environmental matters, social and employee-related aspects, respect for human rights, anti-corruption and bribery issues, and diversity on the Boards of Directors." Richard is optimistic that this will go through all the necessary approvals to become law within the next six months or so - resulting in another 18,000 companies delivering sustainability reports - integrated or standalone- a big increase from the 2,500 that Richard says make some form of disclosure today. Richard talked about ethics and trust  in business as being part of the economic crisis we find ourselves in today, and that these are not only part of the crisis, but the route out of the crisis. He believes the European Directive will help Europe to catch up with progress made in other countries such as South Africa, Denmark, Brazil and more, where non-financial reporting has already been advanced in some form. Interestingly, Richard said that non-financial reporting should not be a big financial burden on companies. He quoted a figure of GBP 4,200 additional cost for each company to produce this information, less for smaller businesses. I am not quite sure how this was calculated but I wouldn't bet my last ice-cream on that one. However, Richard Howitt's perspectives were a great starter for what turned out to be a fascinating, packed day of discussion and ... well.. perspectives.
 
Paul Scott shared the results of the CR Perspectives survey and I can't resist providing a glimpse of a few of the initial results, pending the full and final version later this month. For example:
  • Over 95% of respondents agreed that CR Reporting builds trust. Great news!
  • Mandatory reporting or disclosure was the thing that the highest number of people agreed would lead to better uptake of reporting (I proposed that reporters receive free ice-cream, but I don't think that gained too much ground). 
  • Over half of the survey respondents agreed that improved standardization would lead to better quality reporting.
  • 92% of respondents believe that an annual form of reporting is the way to go, with much less support for continuous updates throughout the year
  • A whopping 63% of reporters supported country-specific reporting, as opposed to regional or global. This is validation for multinationals who commendably invest so much effort in producing local reports.
  • Almost all respondents believe that all stakeholders are important audiences for CR reporting, which continues to make the reporting task a complex one, trying to meet the demands of multiple stakeholder groups.
  • When asked what would make reporting more credible, the highest number of respondents said: bad news! Quantified data, assurance and use of a known reporting standard also came in with quite some support.

During the day, we heard from a range of CR practitioners and experts, including Jo Franses of Coca Cola Enterprises, Rupert Thomas of Royal Dutch Shell, Verity Lawson of BAT, Shannon Shoul of Nike, Core Olsen from Novo Nordisk, Sophie Guillou of La Poste, Joss Tantram of Terrafiniti  and Lois Guthrie, of the Climate Standards Disclosure Board, who is always an interesting contributor.
 
We debated with passion some of the big issues of the day, from the level of understanding that companies have of the value of reporting in a "survival"" context, to the use of reporting to drive corporate value. Of course, the concept of box-ticking came up, as it always does when people talk about reporting, and while a certain amount of that is always required, especially if we move to more standardized formats, the focus on materiality may well drive companies to think more deeply about what really matters rather than what boxes are available to tick.  
 
On credibility, given that the most significant credibility builder is apparently bad news, the one thing that companies don't want to report, I asked the panel what bad news they include in their reports and what they consider bad news to actually mean. The consensus seemed to be that bad news includes: failure to meet targets, failure to address material issues due to significant challenges, and worsening of performance such as in the area of safety or GHG emissions. For bad news to be noticed, it also should not be hidden way and minimized to the point that it's unrecognizable as bad news. This also gave me the opportunity to tell the story of the work I did with GSK Romania in helping to prepare their first, local, CR Report, called Valuing your Trust. In my first meeting with the General Manager, Pascal Prigent, I asked: "What can we not report? What do you not want to include in this CR Report?" Pascal looked me, puzzled, as if this was a rather odd question. His response: "Nothing. You can include in the report anything that is relevant to telling our full, honest and authentic CR performance in all the necessary areas." I didn't actually find too much bad news to disclose at GSK Romania, after interviewing all the management team and tens of others, and reviewing mounds of data and information, but the open approach of leadership and willingness to be fully transparent in the interests of building trust and credibility is something that more reporters would do well to emulate.
 
Now that we have established that bad news works, perhaps we can expect to be reading lots more bad news in future reports. This may be totally depressing but at least we will trust everybody:).
 
Watch this space for more bad news!
 
 

elaine cohen, CSR consultant, winning (CRRA'12) Sustainability Reporter, HR Professional, Ice Cream Addict. Author of Sustainability Reporting for SMEs: Competitive Advantage Through Transparency AND CSR for HR: A necessary partnership for advancing responsible business practices Contact me via www.twitter.com/elainecohen   or via my business website www.b-yond.biz   (Beyond Business Ltd, an inspired CSR consulting and Sustainability Reporting firm)

Sunday, June 10, 2012

First time reports : 8 examples from 2012

Don't you just love first reports? I do. Ha ha. That's not just because I am a reporting geek. It's because a first CSR Report signifies a major step out of the darkness and into the light of transparency. No matter how minimal or even clumsy a first report may be, it represents the fact that one more company has realized that responsibility without transparency is like ice cream without cream, and that sustainability without sustainability reporting is like, well, ice cream without cream.

Apart from the fact that they are first publications, there are no unique defining traits of first reports. They are as varied and multifarious (thanks to Thesaurus.com for multifarious) as second, third and even tenth reports. There are no specific commonalities or characteristics - or even special formulas - which define a first report. There is no template that works for all first reports. What's special about the first report is the breakthrough it represents. Even if it's marketing motivated and greenwash packed, it's a breakthrough. Though don't be fooled - some first reports are highly polished and project a mature approach to reporting.  

Once a company has published a first report, they open themselves up to scrutiny and criticism, (though they might prefer praise and recognition). The fact is, though, that people increase their trust in companies after reading their CSR Reports. And this is even more significant for first timers.

First time reporting inevitably raises new questions for management and sparks healthy internal discussion. This can support decision making and business development, and generally offer another prism through which execs can see their business and its role in society. It's a worthwhile process and every single client I have ever worked with has experienced this.

Having said that, though, there are some first reports which do stretch the term "Sustainability Report" or "CSR Report" to the upper limits of what might reasonably be expected. There are some which are blatantly inadequate to the point of being almost amusing or totally depressing.

If I had a few tips for first time reporters, they would be these:

Get really clear on materiality and your company's sustainability story - don't just list all the good stuff you are doing - make the good stuff count by linking it to both material issues and outcomes.

Keep it short but relevant- some shorter reports can knock the socks off many of the longer ones.

Take it seriously - the best demonstration of a serious approach is to set targets and publicly commit to them. While some reporters use the current reporting year as a baseline, it is still possible to set quantitative targets for future performance. External assurance also lends an additional dimension to a serious approach to reporting - more for its internal value of adding rigor to the process  than because of the additional credibility it affords in the eyes of stakeholders. Use your first report to cut your transparency teeth - have the discussions in the business, and with external stakeholders, hear what they are telling you and shape your program accordingly. Remember that, even though your report might not be a bestseller,  someone somewhere will read it. Make sure your report stands up to scrutiny by each stakeholder who happens to take an interest.

Explain the challenges - no one expects you to be perfect because no one is. Expressing some of the more challenging aspects of your performance adds to your report's credibility.

Always - always - always include personal perspectives - from a range of employees or from external stakeholders. No matter how dry the narrative, real people in your report liven things up and make it much more palatable and credible.

This post is in honor of some of the first timer reports I have come across in 2012, in no particular order. Congrats to all! I  have only included a few and there are tens more published this year that I wanted to highlight as well, but well, even us bloggers have our limits. Maybe I will do another post on the first timers - they are a great bunch.

This is a list of the reports covered in this loooooooooooooooooong post:

Alpha Natural Resources 2011 Sustainability Report (U.S.)
Cogeco Cable,Inc. Canada,2011 Corporate Responsibility Report
Flowserve Corporation U.S. 2011 Sustainability Report
GAIL (India) Ltd, FY 2010-2011 Sustainability Report
Omnicane, Mauritius, 2011 Sustainability Report
Taj Pharmaceuticals Ltd, India, 2011 Sustainability Report
The North Face, U.S. 2010 Sustainability Report
Yüksel İnşaat A.Ş, Turkey, 2011 Sustainability Report

Format: PDF 30 pages and flipper book online
GRI: No
Assurance: No
Materiality Matrix: No
Future Performance Targets: No.
External Stakeholder Commentary: No
Internal Stakeholder Commentary: No
Picture of a Child or a Tree or a Globe on the Cover: No, but there is a green landscape view.
Mentions Ice Cream: No - no ice cream at the coal face.

About the Company
Alpha Natural Resources, headquartered in Virginia, U.S., is the world’s third largest metallurgical coal supplier with production capacity of nearly 126 million tons of steam and metallurgical coal. (Steam coal is primarily purchased by large utilities and industrial customers as fuel for electricity generation and manufacturing, and metallurgical coal is used primarily to make coke, a key component in the steel making process.) Alpha employs 14,000 people, extracting coal from 145 active mines, shipping over 100 million tons of coal worldwide in 2011 and turning over around $7 billion.

About the Report
This report is a very nice first publication. It shows evidence of a company taking a serious approach to managing its own direct impacts. Very early on, Alpha establishes its unique sustainability language - Running Right, Leading Right and Living Right and this leitmotif, which is at the root of Alpha culture, is the basis of the story that Alpha tells. The report has three core sections - our people, our environment and our communities.

Stakeholder Engagement
A nice touch for this first report is a process of stakeholder engagement - Alpha consulted with a list of external organizations representing different stakeholder groups - in order to seek input on material issues. Alpha confirms having learned a lot in the process, and having used this input to crystallize and report on material issues. Unfortunately, beyond disclosing that this process had taken place, Alpha does not share the issues raised, nor does the report present a materiality matrix, leaving us to guess what most important issues came up in consultation. While most of the value, I will admit, is in the stakeholder conversation, I fail to understand why Alpha would not share at least a partial outcome with all stakeholders.

Is Coal Sustainable?
Alpha sidesteps the issue of the overall sustainability of the coal industry and concentrates squarely on the way it does its business. In fairness, the CEO hints at an underlying blip: "At Alpha, we believe there’s a higher purpose to what we do: we’re fueling progress around the world. Coal is an affordable, abundant energy source that plays a key role in producing electricity and steel. We know people’s lives improve – their education levels, quality of life and overall health – when they have access to electricity. And 1.5 billion people currently lack that access. Yet the perception of the coal industry is not particularly good, and our social license to operate is threatened. I think the image of the industry and reality are different – but I also know that perception matters."

In other words, Alpha makes no apologies for being in the coal business -people need coal, and heck, it's legal - and the expression of their Corporate Responsibility is to do it in the right way. This is probably a sensible path for a first report. However, some discussion of the impacts of that perception on Alpha's business might be welcome in future reports - not just about (un)sustainable supply of their core raw material, but also the ways the business will need to navigate an increasingly hostile perception about the role of coal in our society, the way this will impact the cost of doing business and upcoming regulatory issues. How will Alpha deal with this threat to its social license to operate?

Formats
One final point about accessibility: Alpha's ebook report is hosted on issuu.com in a flipper book format - which I find rather illegible. To download it as a PDF you have to register. Normally, I don't bother to go through this hassle but for the purposes of this post, I made the effort. I wish companies would not make it so hard for us to access their reports.
Format: PDF 30 pages
GRI: GRI Application Level B
Assurance: No
Materiality Matrix: No
Future Performance Targets:  Yes - some environmental targets.
External Stakeholder Commentary: No
Internal Stakeholder Commentary: No
Picture of a Child or a Tree or a Globe on the Cover: No - no picture at all.
Mentions Ice Cream: No -  no VOIP ice cream.

About the Company
Cogeco Cable is a telecommunications corporation, the second largest hybrid fibre coaxial cable operator in Ontario, Québec and Portugal. The company has revenues of CA$1.9 billion in Canada and employs 2,511 people in Canada.

About the Report
The report covered Cogeco Cable's operations in Canada only, and the company promises to expand the scope with future reporting. The report is structured about four main sections: economic performance, customers, social performance and communities. The narrative is well and clearly written, follows the GRI structure quite closely, and is easy to read. There are some short case studies throughout the report which add nice perspective. It's concise and factual, no literary creativity here, but it works well enough. A good, solid, first report, testifying to some decent CSR initiatives.

As a first report, meaningful transparency is on the low side, and Cogeco Cable reports on 22 indicators, just two above the level required for GRI Application Level B, and not all are strictly compliant with the GRI requirements.

An interesting point that Cogeco takes care to note, when confirming their self-declared Application Level B is "This grade is not an actual rating of our performance or the implementation of our corporate social responsibility initiatives." - just in case anyone mistakenly thinks that the GRI A, B and C levels are a performance quality grading system :)


 

Format: PDF 30 pages
GRI: Yes, contains an Index and Performance Indicators are noted throughout the report.
Assurance :  No.
Materiality Matrix:  No.
Future Performance Targets: No.
External Stakeholder Commentaries: No.
Internal Stakeholder Commentaries: No.
Picture of a Child or a Tree or a Globe on the Front Cover: Yes, both plants and kids.No Globe though!
Mentions Ice Cream: No ice cream flows in the Flowserve report.

About the Company
Flowserve supplies pumps, valves, seals, automation, and services to the power, oil, gas, chemical, and other industries. The company has more than 16,000 employees in more than 50 countries.

About the Report
This is short report, demonstrating limited progress, signaling the company's intentions as it builds its sustainability approach. Grouped around the traditional quadrant model - marketplace, workplace, environment and community- this report picks off the bits that Flowserve is already addressing in the business - this is primarily employee safety, energy consumption, brief references to water and waste, and community involvement. The report covers 16 indicators, not all fully. Data is provided at different levels - some covers 26 sites, some covers 21 sites.

As far as it goes, this report is clear, although it is somewhat repetitive and emotionless. In a short report of 30 pages, there is an overview of 9 pages, some of which is repeated in the report sections, and later in the report, there is a one-page summary of data which has already been presented. Aside from the CEO and COO introductions, there are no people in the report, and no stories. As a factual status of Flowserve's status, it's ok. For future reports, a little more passion would be nice.


Format:  PDF 84 pages
GRI: Yes, B+
Assurance : Yes, very clear Assurance statement.
Materiality Matrix: Yes, list of top six issues and detailed explanations.
Future Performance Targets: No specific, quantitative targets but a strong statement of intent.
External Stakeholder Commentaries: No.
Internal Stakeholder Commentaries:  No.
Picture of a Child or a Tree or a Globe on the Front Cover: No - it's a gas processing unit.
Mentions Ice Cream: No. Apparently ice cream is not material for gas production.

About the Company
GAIL is a CPSE (Central Public Sector Enterprise) and is the largest state-owned natural gas processing and distribution company in India, headquartered in New Delhi. Revenue is about $7 billion and GAIL has about 3,800 employees.

About the Report
This report is entitled "Value Beyond Business". As my consulting firm is called Beyond Business, I naturally formed an immediate bond with this report :). In his opening remarks, the Chairman and Managing Director says: "Being India’s premier natural gas company for over 25 years, we recognize that our maiden Sustainability Report was indeed overdue but our commitment to the concept of sustainability has always been embedded in our systems, processes and activities."  That's a nice admission, and sets a credible and frank tone for the rest of the report.  A further nice touch is that all the executive directors of the business offer their own perspectives in a short piece which sets out the key focus and challenges from their respective disciplines. (Just a shame that they are all male - a little gender diversity would be a good thing).

(Hardly Any?) Women at GAIL
A propos the all-male Executive Team, I suspect this is a sensitive point at GAIL - in response to indicator LA2 which requires breakdown of workforce by age and by gender - GAIL, despite claiming to respond fully, does not show the gender split of the workforce. In fact, this report refers only very briefly to gender diversity. "A special Women’s Cell at GAIL is focused on reaching out to the women workforce, initiate discussions and adequately address their concerns including sexual harassment at the workplace. Additionally, we have set up Ladies’ Clubs at our operational sites and have instituted GAIL women’s awards to promote their involvement and enhance satisfaction" A women's cell? A Ladies Club? Sounds like GAIL needs to rethink the concept of gender equality. Any guesses on the percentage of women at GAIL?

Thorough reporting
In other respects, GAIL does a very comprehensive job with this first report, and has not spared words and data. Every section is well detailed. The report includes five pages of the history of natural gas development in India, linked to the development of GAIL. India is one of the top five consumers of energy in the world, with gas representing 11% of this consumption and more than half of this is traded by GAIL. The company grew 30% in revenues last year.

Materiality is assessed through an internal process which includes a review of challenges to the global gas and oil industry - but not explicit stakeholder consultation. For a first report, this is a good baseline, and the 32 issues identified were whittled down to the top six which includes sustainable gas sourcing, continuing to grow the business in the face of competition, availability of skilled employees and more. Environmental reporting is detailed and safety figures are clearly stated including reportable, minor and near miss incidents for both payroll employees and contractors. The report even includes a glossary and cross references to the Global Compact Principles and other local reporting frameworks in addition to the GRI Index.

If anything, the overall message of GAIL's contribution to sustainable development and quality of life in India gets a little lost in the fine detail of this long-ish first report. I would recommend a little more focus on the story, and less on the activities, for future publications.  


Format: PDF 46 pages
GRI:  Yes, Application Level C.
Assurance :  No
Materiality Matrix:  No
Future Performance Targets:  No
External Stakeholder Commentaries: No
Internal Stakeholder Commentaries:  No
Picture of a Child or a Tree or a Globe on the Cover: No. But there's a nice blue sky.
Mentions Ice Cream: No. But then, there's no sugar in ice cream. Is there?

About the Company
Omnicane is a Mauritius-based sugar producer, created in 2009 following the rebranding of Mon Trésor Mon Désert Limited (MTMD), a long-established sugarcane group in Mauritius whose origins can be traced back to the 1850s. MTMD was amongst the first companies to be listed on the Stock Exchange of Mauritius and, Omnicane has successfully transformed itself from a basic-commodity supplier into a multi-product, vertically integrated agro-industrial cluster. The company’s main  operations are: sugarcane cultivation, sugar milling and refining and energy production. Omnicane has 1,132 employees and makes around $3.5 billion. Kudos to one of the very few operations in Mauritius to report on sustainability.

About the Report
The report is a well-prepared, professional, clear document - formal in style and following the GRI C Level framework very closely, addressing the GRI disclosure headlines  more or less in the order they appear in the Framework. Performance is disclosed  at minimum level, reporting fully on 11 performance indicators (ten required at Level C) , and in addition, provides a high level of detail by month on chemicals consumed and by week on water discharge quality etc, which is probably unnecessary at this level of detail. The report focuses on environmental sustainability and provides very detailed disclosures about the sugar processing and energy generation aspects of the business.

Bagasse
Did you know what bagasse is? Hmmm, showing my ignorance again. Bagasse is the fibrous matter that remains after sugarcane or sorghum stalks are crushed to extract their juice. (Thanks, Wikipedia). Omnicane assumes that we all know what bagasse is. It would have liked to see this explanation in the report. Omnicane does explain other terms such as fly ash, coal ash, bottom ash, boiler slag, molasses and vinasse - an ethanol manufacturing by-product. Omnicane produces over 2 million Gj per year of bagasse renewable energy which is used in consumption and sold to the National Grid.

CSER
Omincane use the acronym CSER for what we know as CSR or CR. Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility. Add that to your lexicon.

Closing a Factory
One nice piece in this report is the very detailed disclosure of provisions provided for 152 employees affected by a site closure. CSR is not only about the employees you hire, it's also about the employees you fire. Omnicane deals with this openly and responsibly.

No Sugar
Despite the "sweetness" of Omnicane's business, there is no sugar in this report. It's formal, dry and even a little boring. There are no case studies, no testimonials and while it's just about readable for the lay person, it's rather technical and  unexciting. As a first report, it does a good job in getting Omnicane's performance message through, but the story gets lost. I think this group  plays a much bigger role than this report reflects. In future reporting, I would recommend adhering to the GRI Framework but being less constrained by its structure, and focus on the true story of Omnicane's impacts and contribution to sustainable society.  Nonetheless, this is great progress.




Format: PDF 30 pages
GRI: No
Assurance : No
Materiality Matrix: No
Future Performance Targets: No
External Stakeholder Commentaries: No
Internal Stakeholder Commentaries: No
Picture of a Child or a Tree or a Globe on the Cover: Yes, classic. Hands cupping a sapling.
Mentions Ice Cream: No - no ice cream medicines.

About the Company
Taj Pharmaceuticals Limited is a pharmaceutical company founded and based in India. The company manufactures pharmaceutical formulations and API for India and other countries of world, owning about 450 brands and 600 generic licenses. The company was established in 1995 as an enterprise and in 2004 became a public limited company with about $1Bn in sales.

About the Report
This is the kind of report that makes you smile. Or grimace. It's not really a report, but it's a cute attempt to represent a certain social philosophy that is present in the business in an authentic way, with half an eye on the potential reputational benefits of adding Sustainability Report to your corporate resume. It's mainly a copy of the relevant website pages which have some vague connection to CSR, plus a whole set of pages containing legalese disclaimers and website terms of use. The actual Sustainability Report content of this not-really-a-report can be accommodated in a few short pages. There is no data on any aspect of Sustainability Performance.

How do I know that it's half a marketing document? Read this: "We will welcome any Export / Import business partnership with Canada, Mauritius, U.S.A., Moscow, London, Brazil, foreign manufacturers and Indian manufacturers and large or small-scale regional distributors, medical and prophylactic establishments and drugstores. Cooperate with us and we shall together develop the pharmaceutical market for the welfare of the World people, so that we could say together "curing life…". "

The Gems
There are some more "gems" in this report:
"At Taj Pharmaceuticals, we keep to the definition spelt out in the 2004 Brundtland Report ...." (ahem... just a few years too late, but who's counting?)
"We still believe that good corporate citizenship should be a matter of course and is not something to be shouted from the rooftops." ( but ... this report is on the rooftop anyway...)
"Taj Pharmaceutical is your gateway to doing business with people who can make procurement decisions in the rounding antibody Company of World Wide." (and I thought this report was written in English)

Next Report
So, come on Taj Pharma, if you want to produce a second Sustainability Report, it's time to make a more serious effort.  It looks as though the company has some good intentions, but in practice, this "report" is not worthy of its title.



Format: Online only, no download.
GRI: Yes, Application Level C.
Assurance : No
Materiality Matrix: No - but focus areas are defined and key outcomes of a Stakeholder Feedback session are disclosed.
Future Performance Targets: Yes, 2013-2015 goals.
External Stakeholder Commentaries: Yes, several.
Internal Stakeholder Commentaries: Yes - many videos and personal commentaries.
Picture of a Child or a Tree or a Globe on the Cover: No - rock climbing is cooler.
Mentions Ice Cream: Lots of ice, but no ice cream - surely ice cream would help at the North Face?

About the Company (Brand)
The North Face designs and delivers an extensive line of high performance outdoor apparel, equipment and footwear, founded in 1966 and owned by VF Corporation, the guys that bought Timberland. (The North Face is the coldest, most unforgiving side of a mountain). The North Face employs 2080 people across the world and has $1.5 billion revenues in 70 countries.  

About the Report
The North Face is actually a brand, operating as a division of the $7 billion apparel corporation VF. As such, this represents a great initiative - I have often believed that Sustainability Reporting should be by brand, and not just by company. This is a great example. It reads well and oozes credibility.

Presenting the Challenges
The North Face Report is a modest and authentically written account of the  brand at the start of a sustainability journey, supported by its parent company infrastructures (though VF Corporation does not report on sustainability), and declaring the report as presenting the challenges of the road (mountain?) ahead, and not just the successes. It has very much a work-in-progress feel, though core elements of the baseline are nicely presented: stakeholder consultation with external experts, key performance indicators (Fabric Sourcing, Fabric Content, GHG Emissions reductions and Offsets, Office and Packaging Waste, Community Outdoor Participation and volunteerism) and defined program focus areas. Although this is a first report, data is presented since 2009 against KPI's, evidencing the fact that this report is the result of efforts to date, and not simply a declaration of intent.

Online Reporting
This is probably one  of the best online examples of a Sustainability Report presentation, and very fitting for this outdoor brand with appeal to the under-35's including many college students, as well as other consumers, who stay connected using the internet and rely on the web as a main source of information. The online report is on its own mini-site, packed with videos, infographics, plain language "equivalencies" (56 million gallons of water saved = 85 Olympic sized swimming pools) and other helpful design elements. The only personal problem I have with this report is that nothing is downloadable. For those who have an interest in the report content, not the interactive experience, it would be helpful to have the narrative in the form of a document which can be saved and read offline - even a summary document. The online report has no download options at all, not even by section. However, I can, grudgingly, understand the exclusively online presentation, and, in this case, it works.  

Looking Ahead
The North Face has done a great job with this report. In the future, I would like to see a deeper look at employee practices - environmental stewardship is what drives the  sustainability passion at The North Face, but with over 2,000 employees, the brand is still a big employer and I would like to see more of a reference to how the brand maintains a fair, diverse, nurturing workplace, beyond the involvement of employees in outdoor inspiration trips and community programs.


Format: PDF 56 pages
GRI: Yes, Application Level C.
Assurance : No
Materiality Matrix:  No
Future Performance Targets: Yes
External Stakeholder Commentaries: No 
Internal Stakeholder Commentaries:  Yes, many personal quotations from employees.
Picture of a Child or a Tree or a Globe on the Cover:  No. But there is a bird, hovering....
Mentions Ice Cream:  No mention of ice cream. Maybe in the next report ?

About the Company
Yüksel İnşaat A.Ş. was established in 1963 and is an engineering and construction group specializing in transportation, highways, dams, marine structures and other building projects.  The company has several subsidiary companies which are included in the scope of the report. The Group employs 11,360 people, including 3,708 contractor employees and has a turnover of around $1 Billion.

About the Report
This report covers Employees, Environment and Community, and is focused on the direct sustainability impacts of the Yüksel group. The group has been a participant in the UN Global compact since 2006 - proudly, the first company in the construction sector to take on this commitment - and has produced COP's on an annual basis, but this is the first Sustainability Report.

Overall, the report seems authentic and shows evidence of genuine progress and good intention - a local company doing its best to be a responsible citizen in its country, displaying national pride and a keen sense of community responsibility. One of the best pages in the report is a matrix of targets for the subsidiary companies, each of which has three targets, one each in the area of economic, environmental and social. I like this. It shows that this complex group of 18 subsidiary companies is trying to get eveyrone on the same page (no pun intended) and embed a common approach throughout the group. The targets are not quantitative in the main, but aspirational type directions, but it's a fine list all the same. There are a couple of amusing targets: one has as a social target "to train employees in sales and diction in order to increase quality" :), and another has "the creation of a Perfection Center" as their economic target.  I love reports that make me smile!  

Women in the Construction Industry
Yes, you guessed it. Not too many, and Yüksel is not exception. In Turkey, there are 285 women out of a total 4,343 employees (6.56%). Yüksel doesn't make any reference to this. Ironically, though, there are many positive  personal quotations from  Yüksel employees dotted throughout the report - and most of them are women! Perhaps this is Yüksel's way of attracting more women. Data on women in management is not presented.

Happy Employees
Employees are, apparently, deliriously happy at Yüksel. Here is just one quotation from Elif (female) which is pretty representative of most of the others: "It is wonderful to work with Yüksel. Working with Yüksel means working with a young and enthusiastic team, while at the same time benefiting from the experiences of competent masters of their work, developing you being a member of a large and happy family, who can turn work into fun with their smiling faces and working in the shadow of a half a century old sycamore with hundred percent security" Maybe something is lost (or gained?) here in translation, but this is a little too mushy for my liking. Including employee testimonials is a very useful and valid tool in reporting, but there is a fine line between inspiring and mushy. Still, it's nice to see happy employees.  

Assurance, Audit or both or none?
The Yüksel report is declared at GRI C+ level, where the "+", as we all know by now, represents an assurance statement. In fact,  the statement included in the report, by the CSR Association of Turkey,  does not provide any evidence of there having been an assurance process. The brief statement says that the report was sent to the CSR Association for audit. But whether an actual audit took place is not clear. In any event, the "assurance" statement is well short of what I would regards as acceptable practice.

Report Style
This report is obviously translated from Turkish, so it is hard for me to assess if the language, which is a little child-like at times, is representative of the original. It projects a certain authenticity, even though there are errors and awkward phraseology in English. I would always recommend those publishing in English to have the report fully proofed by a native speaker. For just a little extra effort, the report could project a much higher quality. 

Well, got this far? Maybe you also find first reports fascinating! Now you definitiely deserve a rest. And ice cream.

PS: Thanks to CorporateRegister.com , where I found many of the first reports mentioned above.

elaine cohen, CSR consultant, Sustainabilty Reporter, HR Professional, Ice Cream Addict. Author of CSR for HR: A necessary partnership for advancing responsible business practices   Contact me via www.twitter.com/elainecohen   on Twitter or via my business website www.b-yond.biz  (Beyond Business, an inspired CSR consulting and Sustainability Reporting firm)

Saturday, May 5, 2012

Lilly: Sustainability Report Cone Award

This is the third in my series of Sustainability Report Cone Awards.  The second was SGS - net 2 cones. The first was Intuit - also net 2 cones. This time, Lilly, the drug people. Can they beat net 2 cones?

(Note: All cone pictures were sources from Ice Cream Cone ClipArt)


About the Company:
Tenth largest pharmaceutical company in the world.
HQ in U.S.
$23 billion revenue.
38,300 employees.
Manufacturing plants in 13 countries.
NYSE listed.  

About the report:
PDF 103 pages.
GRI Application Level B.
Not externally assured.
UNGC COP included.

Ice Cream Cones Awarded:

Lilly reports on Motor Vehicle Collision Rate. There are just a few companies which do this. I think road safety is a very important measure and would like to see all companies reporting on this. Corporations can have a significant impact on global and local road safety, as I mentioned in an article some time ago.
                                      
Another nice touch in the Lilly report is the reference to the corporation's support for its key local community, the State in which the company HQ is located, Indiana, U.S., and where Lilly is one of the largest employers. Supporting the local community strengthens Lilly's home base and demonstrates commitment to local employees and causes. Local stakeholders will appreciate this focus.

Lilly's Data Summary of environmental performance is a well-laid-out table, showing progress made over four years 2007-2010. Evidence of progress is well presented, showing both absolute measures and intensity measures - for example, absolute waste generation has decreased from 398,000 tons in 2007 to 228,000 tons in 2010, with a corresponding reduction in waste intensity of tons per $ million revenue from 20.3 to 9.88.


Lilly, similar to many companies in the past couple of years, has taken measures to restructure the workforce and layoff people. No report can be complete without reference to the extent of such restructuring  and the way it has been conducted. Lilly addresses this in the report, providing numbers and describing processes to support employees through the transition.



Lilly's report is well constructed in terms of public policy and declarations of corporate approach. The report covers everything from counterfeit drugs to government regulation to differential pricing, Medicare, price controls, role of generics and more. Lilly make it clear where they stand as a business on some very core issues which affect the relationship between business and society. While action is more important than words, public declaration of policy is a first step to ensuring that aligned action follows.

I must also comment on the excellent Workplace Section in this report. Lilly includes 12 pages onworkplace practices, quoting excerpts from "J.K. Lilly Jr.'s 1916 Report on the subject of employment", which apparently has stood the test of time, good coverage of leadership and development programs including core diversity training and a course for helping employees examine the trust disparity among people of different backgrounds, and the new employee community program, Connecting Hearts Abroad, which enables 200 employees to volunteer for two weeks in ten countries around the world, and a new internal social networking site. Interesting progress, albeit that I would have liked to see more impact data, on employee turnover and retention, for example, or on actual gender diversity results. 


Ice Cream Cones Dewarded:

One of the key Big Pharma social impact areas is Access to Medicines. Lilly offers detailed reporting on the way they approach Access to Medicines, focusing on what Lilly is doing and how much money they are allocating to make important drugs more available to those who are deprived of equitable access. Much attention is given, for example, to the Lilly award-winning MDR-TB Partnership - formed in 2003 with the WHO to combat Multi-Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. This is well explained, including background and context of the health issues relating to MDR-TB and challenges in making relevant drugs more accessible and treatment more effective. Lilly cites achievements in awareness campaigns, drugs provided and  healthcare professionals trained - a great story and truly valuable program. What works less well for me, however, is that nowhere  in the pages devoted to this case study is the actual measure of access to these drugs mentioned, nor the effectiveness of the drug in curing people. Awareness is critical but awareness alone does not solve world problems. I wonder how awareness translates into effective outcomes. I would love to see how this program has changed lives, how many people are now treated who were not before. With 9 years of action under the MDR-TB Partnership's belt, I love to know if this is effective use of Lilly's massive investment and the extent of actual social impact. Developing a good measure of program effectiveness is not an easy task by any means, and perhaps my expectations are unreasonably high, but  more about outcomes as a result of action would make this story come alive for me.

Materiality is covered off  superficially for Lilly. There is a list of 5 key issues which are generic enough to be fairly meaningless - such as "The development and production of safe and effective medicines". This is not just a material issue - it seems more like a mission statement. The core, specific material issues for this company are not highlighted. For example, what happens to all those medicines that people receive and are never used ? Lilly has a small section about Product End-of-Life but doesn't really demonstrate real action in this area. This is not identified as a specific material issue.
 
 
Lilly does not externally assure the company's report. For a global business such as Lilly, in a complex business such as pharma, external verification would be a welcome addition to the overall credibility of this report.  No matter how stringent internal reporting standards are, external verification demonstrates a more serious commitment and well, you never know, may even enable inconsistencies, if they exist, to be discovered and corrected. Now, what truly sustainable company would not be interested in this?

Overall Ice Cream Cone Status:
Lilly nets three cones and is therefore in the lead in the Cone Award League Table for 2012. Congratulations! There is no maximum to the number of cones that can be awarded or dewarded, so there is still room for more than three net cones. Watch this space for more Sustainability Report Cone Awards. Who will get to net 4 Cones ?



elaine cohen, CSR Consultant, Sustainability Reporter, HR Professional, Ice Cream Addict. Author of CSR for HR: A necessary partnership for advancing responsible business practices  Contact me via www.twitter.com/elainecohen   on Twitter or via my business website www.b-yond.biz/en  (Beyond Business, an inspired CSR consulting and Sustainability Reporting firm)

Saturday, March 24, 2012

SGS: Sustainability Report Cone Award

Following my first  Ice Cream Cone Award, Intuit, which, since publication, has caused an increase in corporate ice-cream consumption by 24% (and mine by 38%), I am pleased to make another Cone Award to SGS for the Company's Corporate Sustainability Report 2011.

(All ice cream cone images are sourced from: Ice Cream Cone ClipArt ) (Almost good enough to eat!)

About the Company
Headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, SGS is an inspection, verification, testing and certification company with more than 70,000 employees and  a network of more than 1,350 offices and laboratories around the world. Established in 1878, SGS started by offering agricultural inspection services to grain traders in Europe. During the mid 20th century, SGS diversified into inspection, testing, certification and verification services across a variety of sectors, including industrial, minerals and oil, gas and chemicals among others. SGS is listed on  the SIX Swiss Exchange and has revenues of $5.2 billion.

About the Report
Third Corporate Sustainability Report. Conforms to B+ of  the GRI Guidelines as checked by the GRI. Assured by a third party auditor. PDF 84 pages. Separate GRI Index downloadable from the report website.



Ice Cream Cones Awarded

SGS has specific, quantified, timely and published goals through to 2014. Thirteen goals in the areas of Professional Excellence, Environment, People and Community which make it clear what SGS commits to achieving. This is not to be underestimated. Reducing carbon intensity by people and by revenue by 10%, reducing turnover (to below 14%) and sickness absence rate (to below 1.5%) and more, may not be breaking the sound-barrier in terms of stretch, but, as I learnt long ago, "80% of something is better than 100% of nothing". A nice, double cone for SGS for making their targets measurable and transparent.


Good practice for SGS on reporting stakeholder feedback. 1,319 stakeholders responded to a survey about the prior SGS report and in the current report, SGS summarizes the feedback that was  provided. This is a qualitative summary - it might have been nice to see quantitative data, and it is not clear how stakeholders were asked to respond in the survey. SGS also does not disclose the relative mix of stakeholders which provided feedback - 1,319 is made up of employees, customers, contractors, investors, NGO's and others. However, soliciting stakeholder feedback, and disclosing results, even in a rather filtered way, demonstrates a process of recognition for and understanding of the significance of stakeholder engagement.


I like the way that SGS describe their different services offering. While this might be thinly veiled marketing content, SGS offers compact contextual information about why each area of activity is important and contributes to sustainable agriculture, global trade, transportation, biodiversity and more. It's an interesting summary of many of today's global sustainability issues and opportunities, flavored with short stories about how SGS's work is making a difference, for example, through operation of a fleet of mobile laboratories for testing of ballast water, which can disrupt marine ecosystems (did you know that ?), or pioneering work to calculate the carbon footprint associated with farming scallops throughout their entire lifecycle for a Chinese fishery, or a new Battery Test House and E-Mobility Competence Centre in Munich, Germany where we for developing and testing safe electric, hybrid and fuel cell cars.

I wondered whether to award a Cone or deward a Cone for the SGS Risk Matrix (see below). On the one hand, key risks are transparently defined and areas of risks are referenced and explained within the Sustainability Report. On the other hand, I would have like to have known a little more about how this risk matrix was developed, and to what extent it includes stakeholder input. On balance, I settled for awarding rather than dewarding. Remember ? I promised I would try to be magnanimous.




With almost 48% of SGS's revenue being spent on employee wages and benefits, and 8,000 new people being recruited in the last year alone, getting the best out of SGS people and engaging them in sustainability is absolutely compelling. SGS present one of the best overall programs for embedding sustainability at all levels of the organization that I have seen in Sustainability Reports over the years. Ranging from sustainability workshops resulting in commitments to targets, e-learning sustainability programs, learning and development programs, to performance reviews etc, SGS demonstrates CSR for HR in a mature way.


Ice Cream Cones Dewarded

This is a marginal deward. SGS have done something very good. Following a risk assessment, road safety was identified as a number one risk and in India, SGS Launched a country-wide road safety initiative which includes mandatory reporting, distribution of road helmets and reflective jackets etc. So why the deward? I would like to see SGS reporting road safety results and also adopting a global road safety policy. This is one of my pet subjects to track - the impacts of road un-safety are massive and represent a real sustainability issue whichever way you look at it (as I wrote in a post on CSRWire a while ago). So, good progress by SGS, but hoping for more.

Gender diversity is not transparently reported by SGS - almost to the point that it generates a suspicion that performance is really quite poor. 34.4% of the total SGS workforce is female, but while SGS reports that more female employees were promoted to manager level - SGS does not report how many. Instead, SGS reports against an odd indicator called the "equal opportunity ratio"  - apparently the relative ratio of female managers to total female employees versus the ratio of male managers to male employees. Sorry, I don't get it. What I would like to know from SGS is how many women managers are in the business in total. Diverting to the SGS Website, I see that this company is led by an all-male 8-strong Board of Directors, and an Operations Council of senior executives with 25 members, 4 of whom are women (16%). I almost gave another deward for this, but I decided to continue to be magnanimous and stay with one cone down only.

The GRI Index is a separate download. I always find this irritating. I use the GRI Index to navigate sustainability reports. Having it separate from the PDF document is tiresome for me - meaning I have to bounce around between documents to get to information. If a company is producing an 84-page PDF, another couple of pages to integrate the GRI Index doesn't seem to me to be so much of a stretch.


Overall Net Ice Cream Cone Award
Five minus three makes two net cones for SGS. Half a cone each for the women senior execs. Ha-Ha. Overall, an impressive report, nicely laid out, demonstrating good basic commitment. With a little stretch, there will be some ice-cream for the SGS men next year, too!

elaine cohen, CSR consultant, Sustainability Reporter, HR Professional, Ice Cream Addict. Author of CSR for HR: A necessary partnership for advancing responsible business practices  Contact me via www.twitter.com/elainecohen   on Twitter or via my business website www.b-yond.biz/en  (Beyond Business, an inspired CSR consulting and Sustainability Reporting firm)
Related Posts with Thumbnails