AIMing for Best in Class Reporting

I was recently asked by a client to prepare an overview of Best In Class Sustainability Reports. 

Now, I read, review and judge hundreds of sustainability reports each year, and also write several. I find reporting fascinating in all its forms, and there is no sustainability report that is not a source of insight, inspiration or interest for me. Sustainability reports are as diverse as the companies that publish them, and I find it hard to find an overall measure that represents Best in Class. In many of the awards programs in which I participate as a judge, the ultimate selection often becomes the report that achieved an aggregated highest score across a range of criteria - is that the definition of Best in Class? 

Best In Class is defined by the Business Dictionary is: The highest current performance level in an industry, used as a standard or benchmark to be equaled or exceeded.

But sustainability reports can be assessed across so many dimensions that it's not so simple to select a single report that can be used as a standard to be equaled or exceeded. Sustainability reporting is so unique and specific to each company that, while it is possible to compare use of selected reporting frameworks, or the scale of disclosure, or the length, or the colors of the design, creating a single Best in Class standard for reports is misleading. It's possible to compare certain types of disclosure across reports - such as how a company discloses carbon performance or employee engagement - so maybe it's possible to identify Best in Class reporting on certain topics. But overall Best in Class? Is Class every single sustainability report that's published? Or Best in Class for certain types of company, company size or industry sector?

The impossibility of the Best in Class assessment is why I prefer a threshold approach to evaluating the effectiveness of reporting. Framework-agnostic, metrics-agnostic and generally-agnostic, I use a simple model to the evaluate reports I come across every day. It's called the AIM Model. I developed this model for the publication of my annual list of the Top Ten  Sustainability Reports of the year in 2011. Either a report broadly meets the expectations for AIM reporting, or it doesn't. It's not about a score or a leader-board - it's about doing the job or not doing the job.

The AIM (Authenticity, Impacts, Materiality) Model goes like this:
Authenticity stands for: credible reporting that appears balanced and complete; it links reporting to purpose; it uses stakeholder voices to supplement internal narrative; it demonstrates consistency with prior reporting and shows evidence of long-term commitment with a strategy through targets and reported progress against targets; it includes a clear set of policies and positions on important topics and a CEO statement that you believe the CEO has actually read
Impacts stands for: How has the company made a difference, and how it measures that difference; not just a shopping list of activities; measurable outcomes; focused storytelling that supports describing impacts in specific cases.
Materiality stands for: clear materiality process that connects to the materiality topics identified and selected; description of the stakeholder interactions that have influenced the selection of material topics; contextual information that helps us understand the material topics and their relevance and explicit deep-dive reporting on the material topics selected.

Now, some reporters do a great job year after year in delivering reports that meet the AIM Model criteria - generally I know even before I look at the report that these companies will deliver reports that I will find inspiring. Here are three reporters that deserve a recurring 🎯 AIM Award 🎯 for their consistent reporting effectiveness. In random order. 

Marks and Spencer
Marks and Spencer plc is one of the strongest, most consistent, most comprehensive reporters that never fails to impress me with the scale of its programs and the meticulous nature of its planning, target setting and disclosing. The iconic Plan A (that has now become Plan A 2025) is a masterpiece of branding, engagement and evolution of leading sustainability practice. The 2019 Plan A Update is a fairly nuts and bolts 18-page document, no fancy design and no stories, but covers all the Plan A news in brief. Enough so that we know what M&S has been getting up to in the past year.

The prior Plan A Report for 2018 was a fuller update, more colorful (though not much more) and much more detailed.

It includes for example, as well as the individual updates against Plan A's 2025 pillars across all 100 commitments, details of how the company creates value and several pages with the governance structure for Plan A and named individuals responsible for each piece fitting into place. There are also commentaries from external stakeholders.

The Plan A overarching goals are all about Impacts - supporting customers in sustainable living, helping people live happier and healthier lives, transforming communities, science-based carbon targets and more - M&S's goals have been developed from the outside in, understanding global priorities and driving change through the business and its engagement with customers and communities.
The Material focus of Plan A is clearly described and the stakeholder input used to help define and assess material topics is explained. I find it a little odd that M&S does not publish the specific results of the materiality assessment, which they claim to have performed, in an overt way. Rather, the claim is that the most material topics, around 40 of the 100 commitments, are independently assured and a couple of asterisks denote these throughout the report. So, if you have an hour or so to spare, you can compile this list, though it's a little fidgety. Bottom line, however, it that Materiality is defined and there is a lot of supporting information as to how it was done.
And finally, Authenticity. I cannot imagine a company maintaining this scale, scope and pace of achievement and reporting year after year since the launch of Plan A in 2007 (was it that long ago?!) and reporting more generally on sustainability prior to that, without a large measure of Authenticity. Many elements support this including the transparent Plan A governance structure, the clear reporting on performance whether positive or less positive and the detailed methodology of selecting the Plan A components. Definitely worthy of an  🎯AIM Award 🎯

Kingfisher
Kingfisher's reporting is bold, creative, inspiring, coherent and absolutely in line with the AIM model. I have been following Kingfisher's reporting over the years, and even selected Kingfisher's Net Positive 2012-2013 Report as one of my Top Ten CSR Reports of 2013. Kingfisher has the knack of distilling its sustainability vision, mission, program and performance into eye-level, easy-to-follow messages that get through to our minds and hearts. It's reporting for everyone: Kingfisher's 2018-2019 Sustainability Report shows meticulous transparency with on-point metrics across a range of targets alongside well-flowing narrative supported by big bold highlighter pages that anyone can understand.

In terms of Authenticity, Kingfisher publishes performance - successes and challenges - clearly against annual and long-term targets. An external commentary from a sustainability expert and a case study from the community build in external stakeholder voices. A seemingly genuine message from the CEO, Véronique Laury (Yes, it's a woman CEO. YAY!!) expresses both the positioning, the positives and the challenges of Kingfisher's sustainability journey: "In several areas our progress has been slower than we would have liked and challenges with our data systems mean we cannot report this year on two important KPIs relating to timber sourcing and sustainable home products. We know how important these issues are and we are addressing these challenges as a priority."   

Progress against 2018/2019 targets en route to 2050 are set out with clarity:

Kingfisher's entire sustainability strategy is about its overall Impact on the world. Like Marks and Spencer above, it's an outside-in strategy with four net-positive aspirations to 2050 that focus on how Kingfisher makes a difference in the way people live their lives. Kingfisher has guidelines for customers so they can make sustainable choices and measures the proportion of sales that these choices represent. 

Outside-in strategies tend to be closely aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals. Kingfisher goes a step beyond most companies by aligning its Impacts with specific SDG targets.

As for Materiality, yes, that's in there too, supported by a description of the process used to create and revise this list annually, including a specific materiality assessment in 2018 on 25 raw materials used in Kingfisher's products, assessed for human rights and environmental practices, that will be integrated into the overall materiality assessment.

While this report does not follow the In Accordance level of GRI guidelines, an online GRI Content Index is provided.
The CSR Reporting Blog hereby grants an 🎯AIM Award🎯 to Kingfisher for consistently impressive and meaningful sustainability reporting.

Baoviet
Baoviet is one of the leading financial-insurance groups in Vietnam. As a judge in the annual Asia Sustainability Reporting Awards (ASRA), I have been reading Baoviet's reports each year for the past few years and have always been impressed with the way this company pulls its report together with diligence and scrupulous attention to detail. Always rather (too?) long (the 2018 report is 257 pages!), Baoviet presents its comprehensive GRI Standards-based disclosure in a logical and lucid way. As previous reports, Baoviet's 2018 Sustainability Report, Mastering Hi-tech to unlock Sustainable Future, also shows how Baoviet masters disclosure, and not just sustainable insurance.

The report is laid out using the GRI Standards framework, addressing the disclosures in order of the 100, 200, 300 and 400 Standards sets. This is not my personal favorite way of presenting content, but it's a very respectable way of reporting, and has some advantages in terms of easy navigation to each group of topic-connected disclosures. In the case of Baoviet, this is done quite neatly, with a symmetrical order to each page, following the GRI prescribed content for disclosure of Management Approach and associated data.

Wholly AIM, this report covers Authenticity, Impacts and Materiality exhaustively. A deep-dive into risks, opportunities and context supporting the selection of Material topics helps us understand the sustainability challenges of Baoviet.

A strategic approach aligned to the Sustainable Development Goals shows that Baoviet has invested Authentic thought into its planning and sustainable development direction.

Impacts are presented in a specific section describing "indirect economic impacts" (GRI's Standard 203) summarizing Baoviet's overarching contributions to a more sustainable society, with some case studies later on in the report in the section on community involvement (GRI 413).  Definitely deserving of an 🎯AIM Award 🎯, Baoviet could also do this with a shorter report! I'd recommend trimming some of the evergreen detail from this report in future, giving greater focus to the reporting year achievements.

********

So, coming back to my opening thought, would I consider these reports Best in Class?  The highest current performance level in an industry, used as a standard or benchmark to be equaled or exceeded?

I certainly consider these reports that I find inspiring and can learn from. It's possible they might win awards (and all of these companies have won sustainability reporting awards over the years) when pitched against a limited number of entrants in an awards program (and I admit to making these choices as a judge in different awards programs each year.) In the end, I circumvented the question my client posed to me by providing a selection of reporting elements from different companies and reports, a sort of pick'n'mix showing what can be done to achieve AIM reporting, and in some cases, with a little added creativity.  So I think my message here is about delivering the best report you can, wherever you are on your sustainability journey, targeting to meet the needs of your stakeholders.

If your report does this well, some may consider it to be Best in Class.
I'll probably say that it's worth an 🎯AIM Award🎯 !





elaine cohen, CSR consultant, Sustainability Reporter, HR Professional, Ice Cream Addict. Owner/Manager of Beyond Business Ltd, an inspired Sustainability Strategy and Reporting firm having supported 100 client reports to date; author of three books and several chapters on Sustainability Reporting and the Human Resources connection to CSR; frequent chair and speaker at sustainability events and judge in several sustainability awards programs each year. Contact me via Twitter , LinkedIn or via Beyond Business  

The TOP TEN Sustainability Reports of 2014

Another year-end, another excruciating task picking out my Top Ten Sustainability Reports for 2014. It's excruciating because narrowing my selection down to ten is probably the hardest thing I do on the CSR Reporting Blog each year. I am always tempted to go to 15, or 20, or 25... but then I think that tradition has its advantages and I have been picking Top Tens now for several years... 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013. These are always the most popular posts of the year and get thousands and thousands of views. So why change a winning formula? Nevertheless, this year was particularly tough. There really are some great reports out there. 

My selection is always based on reports that cross my radar throughout the year, not a scientific or strict methodical evaluation of the report quality. Some of them have already featured in different blog posts. I try to select a cross-section of companies, sectors and countries, rather than selecting the big names in reporting that generally pick up reporting awards around the world. However, as I have done for the past few years, I use the AIM MODEL as I consider the reports that I find worthy of mention. Each report adds value in its own way, and each report is evidence of progress. Therefore, in mentioning a mere ten reports of the thousands that were published in 2014, I continue to do reporting somewhat of an injustice. On the other hand, highlighting these ten reports and their unique elements may provide insights and inspiration for new reporters, or potentially better reporters. In any event, this is always a post I find both challenging and fun all at the same time. 

Here is a quick reminder of my AIM MODEL: 

Authenticity: I look for whether the company has reported in an honest way, using stakeholder voices to supplement performance data. Authenticity for me includes balance, accuracy and completeness. I look for targets and progress against stated targets.  

Materiality: I look for whether the company has clearly defined the most important issues for the company and its stakeholders and described the way in which those issues have been identified and prioritized. Reporting materiality should also include a certain amount of contextual information which can assist us in understanding the issues and why they are material.  

Impacts: I look for whether the company identified impacts rather than just presenting a shopping list of activities. This means discussing the outcomes of what was achieved. The outcomes are the achievements (impacts), not the activities. This is by far the most difficult thing for companies to address and very few do it well.

And, in alpha order by company name, my Top Ten pick for 2014 includes larger and smaller companies, companies reporting for the first time, companies using the GRI framework at G3 or G4, and companies not using any framework, from all corners of the world and from a range of business sectors.  

1. ArcelorMittal Corporate Responsibility Report 2013
2. DS Smith Sustainability Report 2014
3. Globant Sustainability Report 2013
4. Impahla Integrated Annual Report 2014
5. Kathmandu Sustainability Report 2014
6. Olam Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Report 2014
7. Simple Green Sustainability Report 2014
8. Telekom Austria Sustainability Report 2013/2014
9. Tiffany & Co. Corporate Responsibility Report 2013
10. Wipro Sustainability Report 2013-2013 

And now for the detail: 

ArcelorMittal Corporate Responsibility Report 2013

GRI G3.1, Application Level B+, 7th report

There's something about the consistency and intelligence of ArcelorMittal's reporting that makes it a reporting winner for me this year. ArcelorMittal's global sustainability report is no design extravaganza and you won't find any spectacular graphic elements or sweet photos of kids holding up the world on steel girders. But you will find a carefully crafted, well-written and balanced account of the company's impacts across its value chain, supported by clearly presented performance against targets and future plans, with considered material focus. A selection of short case studies supplement the narrative.

One of the things that has always impressed me about this company is its commitment, not only to global reporting, but also to local engagement. This year, the company published 15 local reports in different markets, each a report in its own right and not a copy-paste translation of the global report (although there is a shared overall strategy framework).

In fact, ArcelorMittal is deepening its local stakeholder engagement efforts, with a plan for engagement at "each and every" ArcelorMittal site. There is a compact stakeholder overview in the global report. 

The global report follows a familiar structure framed around ArcelorMittal's strategy covering: investing in people, making steel more sustainable, enriching communities and transparent governance. In each section, progress is noted and relevant context is provided in each area. This aligns with the material focus of ArcelorMittal.

The material issues were developed in a process involving internal and external stakeholders. The top six issues are all direct impacts of ArcelorMittal's operations.

I wonder if the broader issues relating to the contribution of steel to society and the way steel consumption over time is changing may be equally important. This is addressed by ArcelorMittal in its reporting - I wonder if the materiality process employed was broad enough to include the full value chain impacts of steel-making as well as a focus on the operational impacts of the company. Something for ArcelorMittal to consider in future. However, this does not detract from the fact that this report is well done and fits the aspirational AIM model very well. 

For web-users, ArcelorMittal offers an online interactive infographic this year which is fun to explore.

. 

DS Smith Sustainability Report 2014

Not GRI, 44 pages, 1st report

This is DS Smith's first report and it is swimming against the tide a little (in a way that I find encouraging!). The company says: "We have previously included a section on corporate responsibility within our Annual Report, which was aimed primarily at the financial community, but as our company continues to grow, we now want to broaden our reporting and reach a wider audience." Well, now, it's broadened. I have never noticed any of DS Smith's annual reports but I have noticed this Sustainability Report, and now, you have too!

DS Smith employs more than 21,500 people worldwide, in over 250 facilities across four continents, supplying four main products and services: packaging solutions, containerboard papers for the packaging industry, recycling operations and supply of flexible packaging and dispensing products.

There are several things I like about DH Smith's first report:

First, although it is not a GRI-base report, DH Smith has followed a materiality assessment process, defined material issues and clearly linked the report content to what's material.

The company explains its targets in different sustainability performance areas and links them to corporate values in an innovative presentation.

DS Smith's report includes case studies demonstrating performance and a statement of outcome. This is unlike many case studies in most of the reports that I read that simply describe a nice activity without telling us what kind of a difference it made.

DH Smith's report also includes external stakeholder voices and insights throughout the report, demonstrating a level of engagement in practice and an outward focus on stakeholders.

All in all, a very readable, interesting and AIM-worthy first report.

Globant Sustainability Report 2013

GRI G4 core, 49 pages, 3rd report

Reports from Latin America are generally quite colorful and this one from Globant in Argentina is characterized by bright design that makes reading this report fun. Sustainability is serious but it's also optimistic, energizing, aspirational and more. So many Sustainability Reports are soooooooooooooo serious, sooooooooooooooo tedious and sooooooooooooooooooooo straight-laced that it's no surprise that people moan and groan about how boring they are. Fun reports reflect a fun state-of-mind and it's catching. Globant's report combines this with good transparency and narrative in this G4 core report. 

Globant's business is about developing innovative software solutions for global audiences, headquartered in Argentina with offices around the world, employing more than 3,200 peopple. WPP, the large communication service group, acquired 20% of Globant at the end of 2012. 

Globant's material issues, although appearing right at the end of the report, are clearly (and colorfully) stated. Globant reports on 16 material Aspects and 21 performance indicators, demonstrating considered selection and focus of disclosure.

Each report section follows a similar structure : approach, management and performance narrative, supported by performance indicators and case studies as relevant. Globant provides data for three years, which is good practice. 

Although this report does not contain any external stakeholder voices, much of the narrative is outward looking, referring to impacts on stakeholders and impacts in markets and communities, with stakeholder engagement key players and headlines of their input. In future, it might be nice to see some (colorful) commentary from Globant's stakeholders. In the meantime, a respectable, credible and fun AIM-type report from Buenos Aires. 

Impahla Integrated Annual Report 2014

GRI G4 referenced, 68 pages, 7th report 

By now, if you are a regular CSR Reporting Blog follower, you are probably thinking that I take a commission or something from Impahla, as the Impahla report has featured in my top ten in all but one year, and that was probably only because in 2011, I decided not to pick the same companies as 2010. However, Impahla's reporting is so consistently outstanding that it's not right to discount them because they already reached the top. No, I don't get a commission, kickback or reward of any sort from Impahla. I just think the company is great, with inspiring leadership and totally triple-ice-cream-worthy reporting. Even before we look at the content of this report of this SME company with around 400 employees, just look at the way employees are honored in this report (there are three pages, I show just one of them below):

Of course, not every global company with hundreds of thousands of employees can included a thumbnail of every single employee .... but more than the pictures themselves, this tribute to employees is a rare demonstration of the true appreciation this privately-owned, forward-thinking award-winning sports apparel company has for every individual. Including all employees in Impahla's annual report has become something of a signature style for this company. That's part of the reason that Impahla is special. The other part is the founder-leader, William Hughes, a modest Kenyan-born businessman whose visionary insight and trust-based actions have shaped Impahla into a successful and sustainable business. William writes in his introduction to this 2014 report that it is written as much "for ourselves" as for external stakeholders, which I believe would be a good approach for many companies to adopt. 

The report is neatly put together, smacks of professionalism and attention to detail, and  is a true celebration of employees throughout the narrative. Material issues are described over a couple of pages, and page references guide you to the detailed disclosures.

Results are shared with no holes barred - both the good and the challenging. 

A case study here or there adds a little color.

If there is one suggestion I might make to Impahla for future reporting, it would be to give some external stakeholders a voice. Impahla is a business rooted in the local community, a dedicated supplier to the great PUMA, a significant local employer .... while Impahla tells its story extremely well, the affirmation of external voices would help amplify and reinforce the credibility of Impahla's reporting. However, in my view, Impahla's reporting has been consistently AIMful over several years and I believe, will continue to be so.  

Kathmandu Sustainability Report 2014

GRI G4 core,  63 pages, 3rd report

They say you should never judge a book by its cover. I say you should never judge a Sustainability Report by its photos. But some reports have photos that are just too great to pass over without comment. So it is with Kathmandu. Kathmandu is a leading retailer of outdoor clothing and equipment with 146 stores in Australia and New Zealand and 4 in the UK. The company employs just over 2,000 people. This is Kathmandu's third report. Here are some of the photos.

Although I would have like to have seen a slightly more direct link between material issues and performance indicators reported, Kathmandu works well with the GRI G4 framework in a focused 32 page report, covering its stated material issues.

An overarching issue for any apparel manufacturer is always supply chain management. Kathmandu deals with this well, with full description of the company's approach and strong relationship with a key supplier, while admitting that, at the other end of the spectrum,"we acknowledge that we have suppliers who are not achieving high standards and we are striving to increase awareness and assist them to build capacity." The challenges are by no means simple and Kathmandu transparently related an incidence of child labor in a new proposed factory as a young girl aged 15 had falsified her age and an older relative had provided verification. Kathmandu details its approach to instances of this nature - things, I suspect, that plague every manufacture using outsourced operations. Kathmandu's report also provides short case studies and outcomes of environmental activities in a way that is easy for us to understand.

As short, focused, materially relevant reports go, Kathmandu is definitely on the AIM scale. 

Olam Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Report 2014

GRI G3.1, Application Level C, 58 pages, 7th report

Olam International is a leading agri-business operating from seed to shelf in 65 countries, supplying food and industrial raw materials to over 13,800 customers worldwide with a team of 23,000 employees. Key raw materials supplied include cocoa, coffee, cashew, rice and cotton. Olam apparently means "transcending boundaries" - though I am not sure in which language - and this theme comes through in Olam's reporting. Taking a landscape view of the overall value chain is a good place to start. 

Olam's 2014 report is a simple GRI G3 Application Level C affair. Or so it seems. In reality, it's an exceptionally cleverly written and designed, compact account of how Olam is making a difference in 7 key sustainability focus areas, presented as case studies in the report and exemplifying Olam's holistic sustainability approach.  

In each section, we are provoded with relevant context, Olam's actions, connections to other parts of the value chain and outcomes.

The narrative is short but the message gets through. Definitely Olam has AIMed for an impressive report, demonstrating equally impressive performance.

Simple Green Sustainability Report 2014

GRI G4 core, 55 pages, 1st report

Simple Green is the brand of Sunshine Makers, a privately-owned family company founded over 39 ago by the father of Bruce FaBrizio who runs the company today. The company developed a biodegradable, not-toxic, non-flammable, non-abrasive cleaning formula and now sells environmentally friendly cleaning products in 41 countries, manufactured in 11 facilities worldwide. Sunshine Makers employs 59 people directly and works with a network of partners for distribution. Sunshine Makers also founded EGBAR (“Everything’s Gonna Be All Right”), a non-profit foundation for environmental education and community improvement projects. I reviewed Simple Green's inaugural 2014 report on my recent post about U.S. first-time G4 reporters.

Simple Green does a nice job of reporting for the first time and using the G4 framework, two achievements rolled into one. As the name of the brand, so the report. It's simple, and it's green. The report takes a value chain approach and uses material issues to drive the reporting content.

The company covers its key sustainability risks in a transparent way over several pages of the report.

External stakeholder voices are represented also throughout the report. 

A very greenly AIMified report.

Telekom Austria Sustainability Report 2013/2014

GRI G4 comprehensive,  92 pages, 12th report

Telekom Austria is the largest telecommunications company in Austria serving many countries in central and eastern Europe with products and services including voice telephony, broadband internet, multimedia services, data and IT solutions. The total group has more than 16,000 employees serving around 23 million customers. I reviewed Telekom Austria's Sustainability Report earlier this year in a post on the CSR Reporting Blog. As I mentioned in that post, Telekom Austria has a history of consistently fascinating and creative reports that reflect an authentic consideration of sustainability issues that are embedded in the way the company does business. As a G4 comprehensive report, this 2013 edition covers a lot of ground in its 92 pages. Materiality drives this report: 

An interesting thing about Telekom Austrian's report, as I wrote earlier this year, is the use of external insights to raise critical reporting questions and perspectives. This is a report that you read to help you think about issues, not just learn about the performance of a specific company. 

Telekom Austria also presents performance in a clear way, showing both continuity and intent.

Overall, AIMworthy performance and reporting from Telekom Austria. 

Tiffany & Co. Corporate Responsibility Report 2013

GRI G4 core, 55 pages, 4th report

I blogged about Tiffany and Co's 2012 Report during 2014, and this one is even more sparkling than the last. Not only because of all the spectacular diamonds.

Tiffany's report is as elegant in narrative style as it is in design. The story of diamonds is well told, with responsible mining, as you might have guessed, being the number one issue that is addressed comprehensively in this report. Tiffany has adopted a leadership approach in its own operations and in the sector over many years. 

What I like about Tiffany's reporting is the detail provided regarding sourcing of different raw materials, many of which have been controversial at some point and/or remain so today. Tiffany explains its sourcing, auditing and traceability processes, and its corporate position for each. 

A full set of focus areas is included in the report - following a materiality assessment - although it is not clear to what extent specific engagement with stakeholders shaped this approach, or whether it was the result of internal analysis of trends, issues and analysis.

Tiffany's 2013 report is, I believe, an AIM-driven report.

Wipro Sustainability Report 2013-2013 

Not GRI (GRI referenced), 6th report, online with 106 page download

Wipro Limited is a global leader in providing IT Services, Outsourced R&D, Infrastructure Services, Business Process Services and Business Consulting. Wipro has a workforce of over 140,000 employees and serves over 950 clients across 57 countries. 

Wipro's 2012-2013 Sustainability Report is not just a report, it's an entire education. Telling the story of the migration patterns of butterflies on journeys which includes Wipro's biodiversity-friendly designed campus in Bangalore, Wipro likens the path of sustainability to their butterfllies' journey - transformation, tenacity and endurance. "The sustainability journey is similar and progress happens in small and often invisible steps. We think that every such step, every movement forward is important . Eventually the actions and thoughts of the many will add up to a critical gestalt, a point of significant inflection. The butterfly’s journey symbolizes a spirit of commitment to its future generations in the face of severe odds. It is to this spirit that our sustainability report this year is dedicated." That's probably the most inspiring sustainability report opener that I have seen this year, or even ever. It's a fabulous story, not plucked only out of Wipro's imagination, but an example of a sort of miraclulous and uplifting event that touched the hearts of the Wipro folks. It's really nice. You should read the butterflies' story. 

But that's not all. Wipro's sustainability report is also a reading list. It seeks not only to inform but to educate, commemorate and inspire.

With excerpts from classics that represent the landmarks of the sustainability movement, beautifully designed, this report is an entire Environmental Sustainability Education Program.

But don't get distracted by Wipro's creativity and respect for the great sustainability thinkers of our time. Wipro apparently has some sustainability thinkers of its own. The report is well constructed, referencing, not conforming, to GRI, but nonetheless, applying a material core. Not one, but two. Wipro splits its materiality analysis into two - actually, this is an interesting approach - and present smaterial issues for both econo-environmental and social aspects.

Wipro's report contains an overview of business and sustainability megaforces that provides important context and perspective. This is under the theme of the Sustainability Mobius.

I am not sure if I should be embarrassed to admit that I had no idea what a mobius is. How many people know that?  Anyway, now I know that it's something that usually looks like this:

And I also know why it's relevant: "..... complex, interrelated issues and our fragmented and siloed societal structures have largely been incapable of responding to these with a greater sense of urgency. The lines are blurring between all the stakeholders, their interests and business – with no clear start and end points much like the mobius strip."

Wipro presents achievements in the reporting year and objectives for the future - mainly qualitative but some quantitative targets. It's all very clear and very orderly and very meticulously done. If there were to be one suggestion I would make to Wipro for future reporting, it would be to raise the bar a little beyond operational activities in favor of greater emphasis on external impacts and contribution through core business accounting for the transformational change the company drives in society at different levels. Even so, this report has AIMed for much more than a report, and it's an absolutely deserving member of the 2014 Top Ten club.  

***************

I hope you enjoyed this overview and that you have met some reports that you hadn't seen before. I hope these reports bring inspiration for other reporters. Using these reporting ideas is never quite as simple as copy-pasting, because every company has a unique message, style and tone. However, some of the Top Ten reports may help you look at things in a different way as you undertake your first, or next, reporting cycle in 2015. Good luck!

NB: As usual, to be fair, I did not include reports that I have worked on or from other clients or affiliate or parent companies. If I were to do that, I wouldn't have room for any other reports ha-ha. But it also shows you how magnanimous we are on the CSR Reporting Blog :)) Gotta give 'n take a little in life, right? For reports I have worked on in 2014, see the Beyond Business (new improved) website.

Happy Reporting in 2015, everyone! 
Here's to the next Top Ten.

elaine cohen, CSR consultant, Sustainability Reporter, HR Professional, Ice Cream Addict. Author of Understanding G4: the Concise guide to Next Generation Sustainability Reporting  AND  Sustainability Reporting for SMEs: Competitive Advantage Through Transparency AND CSR for HR: A necessary partnership for advancing responsible business practices . Contact me via Twitter (@elainecohen)  or via my business website www.b-yond.biz   (Beyond Business Ltd, an inspired CSR consulting and Sustainability Reporting firm). Need help writing YOUR Top Ten Report in 2015? Contact Elaine: info@b-yond.biz